rustio rustio.net

tokmd-io-port vs clawft-platform vs async-fs

Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates

Core Metrics

tokmd-io-portclawft-platformasync-fs
Health Score615867
Total Downloads4.7K72548.2M
30d Downloads1.8K02.0M
Dependents81201.3K
Releases122218
Last Updated18d ago87d ago302d ago
Age4m3m7y 2m

Health Breakdown

tokmd-io-port
Maintenance
19
Quality
17
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
clawft-platform
Maintenance
18
Quality
14
Community
11
Popularity
3
Documentation
12
async-fs
Maintenance
6
Quality
19
Community
19
Popularity
8
Documentation
15

Technical Details

tokmd-io-portclawft-platformasync-fs
Version1.14.00.6.122.2.0
Stable (≥1.0)✓ Yes✗ No✓ Yes
LicenseMIT OR Apache-2.0MIT OR Apache-2.0Apache-2.0 OR MIT
Dependencies2155
Crate Size14KB26KB19KB
Features030
Yanked %0.0%0.0%0.0%
Edition202420242021
MSRV1.931.71
Owners111 (team)

Quick Verdict

  • async-fs leads with a health score of 67/100, but none of the options score above 80.
  • async-fs is depended on by 1.3K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
  • clawft-platform is pre-1.0 — API may change.