Decision Workspace
tokio-sticky-channel vs libsync vs helixrouter
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
49
tokio-sticky-channel
experimentalv0.1.3
Sticky channel pattern for Tokio - routes messages to specific receivers based on ID hash for consistent message delivery
52
libsync
growingv0.4.0
Synchronise stuff
52
helixrouter
experimentalv1.0.2
Adaptive async compute routing engine: per-job strategy selection (inline/spawn/pool/batch/drop) driven by live pressure, EMA latency, and online-learned quality estimates.
Core Metrics
| tokio-sticky-channel | libsync | helixrouter | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 49 | 52 | 52 |
| Total Downloads | 1.5K | 2.7K | 53 |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dependents | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Releases | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Last Updated | 361d ago | 55d ago | 116d ago |
| Age | 12m | 2y 2m | 3m |
Health Breakdown
tokio-sticky-channel
Maintenance
13
Quality
13
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
libsync
Maintenance
16
Quality
15
Community
7
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
helixrouter
Maintenance
13
Quality
16
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
15
Technical Details
| tokio-sticky-channel | libsync | helixrouter | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.3 | 0.4.0 | 1.0.2 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✓ Yes |
| License | MIT/Apache-2.0 | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Dependencies | 4 | 10 | 15 |
| Crate Size | 20KB | 62KB | 142KB |
| Features | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2024 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | 1.81 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •libsync leads with a health score of 52/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •tokio-sticky-channel, libsync are pre-1.0 — API may change.