Decision Workspace
optical-flow-lk vs trackforge vs oximedia-cv
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
49
optical-flow-lk
growingv0.3.1
Rust implementation of Lucas-Kanade optical flow and Shi-Tomasi feature detection
58
trackforge
experimentalv0.3.0
A unified, high-performance computer vision tracking library.
54
oximedia-cv
experimentalv0.1.8
Computer vision for OxiMedia
Core Metrics
| optical-flow-lk | trackforge | oximedia-cv | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 49 | 58 | 54 |
| Total Downloads | 2.8K | 1.0K | 1.1K |
| 30d Downloads | 945 | 0 | 0 |
| Dependents | 0 | 0 | 101 |
| Releases | 4 | 7 | 9 |
| Last Updated | 24d ago | 36d ago | 40d ago |
| Age | 1y 4m | 6m | 4m |
Health Breakdown
optical-flow-lk
Maintenance
14
Quality
12
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
trackforge
Maintenance
18
Quality
15
Community
6
Popularity
4
Documentation
15
oximedia-cv
Maintenance
18
Quality
9
Community
11
Popularity
4
Documentation
12
Technical Details
| optical-flow-lk | trackforge | oximedia-cv | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.3.1 | 0.3.0 | 0.1.8 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 5 | 7 | 9 |
| Crate Size | 740KB | 64KB | 609KB |
| Features | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 11.1% |
| Edition | 2024 | 2024 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | 1.89 | 1.75 |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •trackforge leads with a health score of 58/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •optical-flow-lk has the most downloads (2.8K), suggesting wider adoption.
- •oximedia-cv is depended on by 101 crates — strongest ecosystem trust.