Decision Workspace
in-situ vs iobuf vs sashimi
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
47
in-situ
growingv0.6.0
In Situ Endian-Independent Bytes Access
50
iobuf
growingv5.8.1
A contiguous region of bytes, useful for I/O operations.
43
sashimi
growingv0.2.1
Simple, straightforward, zero-copy, general-purpose parsing library. Opinionated by default, with customizable rules.
Core Metrics
| in-situ | iobuf | sashimi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 47 | 50 | 43 |
| Total Downloads | 6.6K | 263.2K | 4.3K |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dependents | 0 | 6 | 5 |
| Releases | 6 | 78 | 4 |
| Last Updated | 226d ago | 3277d ago | 258d ago |
| Age | 8y 2m | 11y 7m | 4y |
Health Breakdown
in-situ
Maintenance
6
Quality
15
Community
6
Popularity
5
Documentation
15
iobuf
Maintenance
7
Quality
21
Community
5
Popularity
6
Documentation
11
sashimi
Maintenance
6
Quality
15
Community
8
Popularity
4
Documentation
10
Technical Details
| in-situ | iobuf | sashimi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.6.0 | 5.8.1 | 0.2.1 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✓ Yes | ✗ No |
| License | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT | CC0-1.0 |
| Dependencies | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Crate Size | 10KB | 34KB | 10KB |
| Features | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Edition | 2024 | — | 2024 |
| MSRV | 1.85.0 | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •iobuf leads with a health score of 50/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •⚠ iobuf has not been updated in over a year.
- •in-situ, sashimi are pre-1.0 — API may change.