Decision Workspace
glifnames vs glyph-names vs swash
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
38
glifnames
growingv0.2.0
Mapping of characters to glyph names according to the Adobe Glyph List Specification
52
glyph-names
growingv0.2.0
Mapping of characters to glyph names according to the Adobe Glyph List Specification
64
swash
growingv0.2.9
Font introspection, complex text shaping and glyph rendering.
Core Metrics
| glifnames | glyph-names | swash | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 38 | 52 | 64 |
| Total Downloads | 1.6K | 714.8K | 9.4M |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 94.2K | 847.3K |
| Dependents | 0 | 34 | 1.1K |
| Releases | 1 | 2 | 30 |
| Last Updated | 1296d ago | 1252d ago | 31d ago |
| Age | 3y 6m | 6y 4m | 5y 2m |
Health Breakdown
glifnames
Maintenance
1
Quality
15
Community
5
Popularity
4
Documentation
13
glyph-names
Maintenance
3
Quality
16
Community
14
Popularity
7
Documentation
12
swash
Maintenance
16
Quality
12
Community
18
Popularity
8
Documentation
10
Technical Details
| glifnames | glyph-names | swash | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.2.0 | 0.2.0 | 0.2.9 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 OR MIT |
| Dependencies | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Crate Size | 131KB | 50KB | 238KB |
| Features | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 13.3% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2018 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 2 (team) | 3 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •swash leads with a health score of 64/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •swash is depended on by 1.1K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.
- •⚠ glifnames, glyph-names have not been updated in over a year.