Decision Workspace
ct-warp vs ct-cuda-prep vs cudarc
Side-by-side comparison of Rust crates
39
ct-warp
experimentalv0.1.0
Warp-level GPU primitives for constraint theory — cooperative search, ballot, shuffle
40
ct-cuda-prep
experimentalv0.1.0
GPU-ready CUDA snap kernels — compile-verified, CPU fallback, PTX analysis
68
cudarc
growingv0.19.8
Safe and minimal CUDA bindings
Core Metrics
| ct-warp | ct-cuda-prep | cudarc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Health Score | 39 | 40 | 68 |
| Total Downloads | 19 | 19 | 5.9M |
| 30d Downloads | 0 | 0 | 517.9K |
| Dependents | 0 | 0 | 2.6K |
| Releases | 1 | 1 | 87 |
| Last Updated | 77d ago | 78d ago | 24d ago |
| Age | 2m | 2m | 3y 10m |
Health Breakdown
ct-warp
Maintenance
9
Quality
15
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
7
ct-cuda-prep
Maintenance
9
Quality
16
Community
6
Popularity
2
Documentation
7
cudarc
Maintenance
17
Quality
15
Community
15
Popularity
8
Documentation
13
Technical Details
| ct-warp | ct-cuda-prep | cudarc | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Version | 0.1.0 | 0.1.0 | 0.19.8 |
| Stable (≥1.0) | ✗ No | ✗ No | ✗ No |
| License | MIT | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Dependencies | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Crate Size | 4KB | 5KB | 567KB |
| Features | 0 | 1 | 68 |
| Yanked % | 0.0% | 0.0% | 2.3% |
| Edition | 2021 | 2021 | 2021 |
| MSRV | — | — | — |
| Owners | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Links
Quick Verdict
- •cudarc leads with a health score of 68/100, but none of the options score above 80.
- •cudarc is depended on by 2.6K crates — strongest ecosystem trust.